Okay, this adaptation isn’t technically a film, it’s a three-part BBC mini-series. BUT, it has pretty lavish production values, and I binge watched it, which gave it the feel of a film. So, I’m going to bend the rules slightly so I can talk about it here.
I was instantly drawn in by the stylish design and direction, which were very successful in capturing the moody tone of intrigue, and the idea of something sinister lurking beneath the surface, that pervade much of Christie’s work.
I thought it was well acted by all, and the implementation of flashbacks did well to deliberately confuse. It reflected the complexity of the family dynamic, and the disorientating feeling of not knowing who you can trust. As such, it confuses in a way that gets its hooks into you, making you all the more determined to see how everything plays out, and how the pieces of the puzzle fit together. This makes the final reveals all the more satisfying.
Speaking of reveals, however, it’s certainly not an entirely faithful adaptation, and Christie purists may be disgruntled to learn that the identity of whodunnit has been changed. I’m still not entirely sure how I feel about this decision. In some respects, it seems odd, as whodunnit is kind of the whole point of stories in this genre. But in other ways, I felt some changes to the narrative, particularly the climax and conclusion, worked better in a visual context, and it did make me admire the production team for their boldness. They did, indeed, play off reader expectations in clever ways throughout, striking an interesting balance between familiarity and surprises; just when you think you know where something is going, they catch you off guard. It can be argued that it’s a valid way of putting a fresh spin on a classic story, whilst still honouring the source material’s concept and tone.
All-in-all, I think it’s well worth checking out if you’re a Christie fan; albeit with the prior knowledge that things won’t necessarily play out as you’d expect. Think of it like an homage, more than an adaptation, and you may well get drawn in.
I usually enjoy BBC productions, and since I haven’t read any Christie books, it’d be fun for me to watch the series first and then go back to reading. I’m a fan of mini-series–it seems like they’re becoming a little more common now.
I am too! And I think they work particularly well for book adaptations. I like that they allow a bit more time to develop things than they would have in a film, but they don’t have to over stretch things to make it into a full TV show.
There are times when I’m happy that two works of art sort of speak to each other instead of being as similar as possible, but I can’t say that is always true for me. I know Alfred Hitchcock’s Rebecca is pretty faithful to the novel, but Hitchcock didn’t want it that way, and the producer had to watch Hitchcock’s every move to get a faithful rendition.
Does Bill Nighy have a large role in the Christie film? I love his work!
I agree, some things work well on the page that wouldn’t translate well to the screen, so an adaptation should always be given freedom to breathe. In some cases, a direct translation works well, in others, it’s necessary to make significant changes whilst honouring the spirit of the source material.
Yes, Nighy plays a key role.
The only BBC adaptation I’ve seen is Pride and Prejudice, and I rarely watch mini series (don’t judge, I watch too much American television). Based on your review, though, I’ll likely give this a go 🙂
Oh don’t worry, I haven’t watched a ton of mini-series either, but I’d definitely like to try more 😊 They seem to offer good scope and scale for book adaptations.
I just watched a BBC (I think) reproduction of And Then There Were None–3 parts too I think. I love Agatha Christie but this was a bit dark for what I’m used to from her. Is this one like that? Maybe I’ll watch it.
🙂
Yes, I’ve seen that one too 🙂 It was the same woman who wrote the screenplay for both, so tonally there are some parallels. Though I would say I found the book of And Then There Were None one of Christie’s darker offerings in the first place, so I didn’t find Order by Innocence (the book or mini-series) as dark, personally. Then again, murder and betrayal are never going to sit too much on the light side 😉
I hope you enjoy it if you decide to give it a go!
Good explanation. I’m more into cozies than dark stuff but Agatha can’t write everything like Miss Marple can she now? Thanks for your thoughts.
No problem 😊
Ooo… I’m so torn. On the one hand I can definitely be a bit of a purist snob when it comes to classics… On the other hand, BILL NIGHY. I love that man. 💖💖
He’s great, isn’t he? I known what you mean, normally big changes to plot would annoy me, but somehow I felt it mostly worked here.
Well, I’ll check it out with an open mind. 😊
I hope you enjoy it! 😊
Pingback: Wrap Up: June 2018 or look how colourful all those books are. – I have thoughts on books