Transcendent Kingdom by Yaa Gyasi
Published by Viking, 2020
Rating: ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Despite the largely rave reviews that have been pouring in, and how much I admired it myself, I can see why this novel might not work for everyone. It’s slow and ruminative with next to no plot beyond what we’re told in the synopsis, and it deliberately denies readers answers to the big questions it poses. Because of these qualities, I must confess it took me some time to get drawn in, worrying initially that the narrative would remain too emotionally distant and lacking a sense of drive. But around the half-way point, once the focus shifted firmly onto the book’s primary thematic concerns, it completely won me round.
We follow Gifty, a 28-year-old scientist living in America, daughter to Ghanaian immigrant parents. Despite her very Christian upbringing, Gifty has largely turned her back on the church, her faith having been pushed too far by her father’s abandonment, her brother’s drug related death, and her mother’s resulting depression. With religion having failed to provide her with answers to the how and why of her family’s suffering, Gifty now devotes herself to her scientific research. As she seeks to understand the nature of freewill in the face of addiction, she hopes to better understand how her brother could have pushed himself to the fate he endured.
With this setup, Gyasi is able to explore a myriad of fascinating themes. Chiefly, whether belief in science and religion can coexist, and if either can ever offer true closure for distinctly human problems. I was hugely impressed by the author’s ability to show keen insight into the comfort and failings inherent to both, without sitting in judgement of those who turn to either.
The prose itself is very strong, beautiful without feeling overwrought. Take for example the author’s knack for well-placed imagery:
“If I’ve thought of my mother as callous, and many times I have, then it is important to remember what a callus is: the hardened tissue that forms over a wound.”
“I, too, have spent years creating my little moat of good deeds in an attempt to protect the castle of myself.”
Or take her ability to hit you in the gut with the poignancy of raw, emotional insight:
“Forget for a moment what he looked like on paper, and instead see him as he was in all of his glory, in all of his beauty. It’s true that for years before he died, I would look at his face and think, What a pity, what a waste. But the waste was my own, the waste was what I missed whenever I looked at him and saw just his addiction.”
Once we get beyond a slow start that seems to dance around the provision of any real detail, Gyasi delves fully into the exact nature of Nana’s addiction and the devastating impact it has on the mental health of Gifty and her mother. In Nana’s story, there is obvious critique of the handling of the US opioid crisis. Knowing his eventual fate makes the journey no less tragic, however, and I thought the tangential weaving in and out of the past suited the first-person narration perfectly, being very true to the nature of memory and self-reflection.
The book is also pleasingly nuanced, with Gyasi showing how interlinked various social issues are. It’s impossible for Gifty to consider the heartache she felt over her brother’s death without also considering the shame and resentment she felt towards him for perpetuating racial stereotypes about young, Black men and substance abuse – strengthening her own internalised racism, and further ostracising her from her predominantly white community. It’s equally impossible for her to consider the hard-won success of her academic career in science without considering the reality that her identity as a Black woman from a poor, religious background makes her very much a minority in her field.
It was here, however, that I felt the book failed to dive as deep as it could have with one key thread present in the narrative. Namely, Gifty’s sexuality. Through her contemplation of the past, we know Gifty has had romantic/sexual relationships with at least one man and one woman. The normalised, casual way she refers to this apparent queerness would normally be very welcome, but given the way this particular character (understandably) views every other aspect of her life through the lens of her strictly Christian upbringing, it feels like a missed opportunity to not explore the inevitably complex attitude she would have towards her sexuality.
All that said, Transcendent Kingdom is tender and intelligently understated. Reading it was a rich and rewarding experience, and though its somewhat circulatory, ambiguous conclusion may frustrate some, it is befitting of the novel’s look at the need to find inner peace, even if it means forgoing the answers we so desperately crave.
You make a really good point about how the book deals with Gifty’s sexuality. My sense was that she hadn’t fully come to terms with it herself, and so doesn’t interrogate it like she does other aspects of her life.
That’s definitely a good theory! Given the novel’s look at the frustration of not having all the answers, I can see that might be what Gyasi was going for. I suppose the rest of the book was so intersectional in its commentary that I kept expecting it to dive deeper into Gifty’s specific views on sexuality, meaning the thread ultimately felt unfinished to me.
I am glad you enjoyed it, even if it took you a while to be caught in. Actually, I thought it was quite nice, that her relations to both men and women (or at least one of each) weren’t given special attention, but felt like a natural part of life. Of course, now you point it out, it was perhaps out of character, but I felt her fear of getting too close to other people messed up her relations to the extent that she boxed in many of her feelings relating to these relationships, hence didn’t reflect upon them the way she did about most other things.
I totally agree! In pretty much any other case, I would have adored the casual references to her sexuality; I just felt with Gifty’s particular upbringing and worldview, the author had a chance to tap into some great additional commentary on internalised shame. Still, it was a very impressive read on the whole. 😊
Oh I am so glad you enjoyed this! I am positive I will love it too.
I hope you do! I will of course keep an eye out for your thoughts 👀
Great review! I’ve been looking forward to this and I think you review has got me even more excited, even if the novel does falter in places.
Thank you! It certainly deserves all the hype it’s been getting. I hope you enjoy it and I look forward to your thoughts!
Pingback: March Wrap Up | Callum McLaughlin
Fantastic review! I’m so glad you ended up liking so much about this one, and your note about the book’s failure to explore Gifty’s sexuality through the same lens as the other major topics in her life is an intriguing one- I wholeheartedly loved this book, but I think you’re right about that being one aspect that could have made it even better.
Thank you so much! It’s such a great book and I’m not at all surprised so many people have been loving it.