Supper Club by Lara Williams
Published by Hamish Hamilton, 2019
My rating: ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
It’s proving tricky to reconcile my feelings for this book, which I found simultaneously incisive and frustrating. We follow Roberta, a woman in her late 20s who sets up a supper club where she and fellow women can intentionally live to excess. It starts as a means of indulging their love of food without the scrutiny of men or the pressure to appear dainty and refined, but the gatherings become increasingly hedonistic and dangerous.
I love what the supper club itself represents: women’s desire to break free of the male gaze and societal expectations; to live freely and to unapologetically take up space in ways and places they would normally be excluded from. It’s no coincidence that many of the women attending the gatherings have had their bodies violated or policed in some way by men, be they rape survivors, domestic abuse victims, or otherwise. As such, it’s clear there’s more going on beneath the surface for many of these women – Roberta included – as they use the supper club as a means to take back autonomy of their bodies and to collectively excise their buried trauma. Flashbacks to Roberta’s time at university a decade prior build on this theme, showing how the seeds of early trauma and social conditioning can continue to influence your wellbeing, behaviour and outlook years down the line. Across both timelines, Williams also does a good job of showing how both overt and micro-aggressions can quash female resolve and cause women to internalise misogyny of their own.
My trouble is how ironically self-indulgent the book is. Clunky dialogue full of exposition regularly spells out the novel’s every thematic intention with little room for debate. When a book is otherwise tackling interesting topics well, this heavy-handedness feels particularly awkward. Whilst it’s great to read a novel with lots of casual LGBT+ representation, the handling of queerness also felt a little clumsy and tokenistic at times. The introduction of a trans woman is particularly uncouth. She is deliberately misgendered, repeatedly referred to using male pronouns, allowing for her trans identity to be revealed like a plot twist before the switch is made to her correct pronouns. Well-meaning representation, perhaps, but certainly not without its flaws.
The book occasionally homes in on the importance and complexity of sisterhood, and I think this is where its real strength lies. But while the female supporting characters all remain flat archetypes who float in and out of the narrative purely to further Roberta’s story, a lot of time is spent on the various awful men in her life. This feels like an odd choice considering the book’s supposed focus on women removing themselves from male influence. Given the novel’s fixation with transformation, I also think the ending was underwhelming somehow; important in its own way, but not as bold or subversive as the novel seemed to be striving for.
This is one of those novels that had so many good ingredients (pardon the pun) that I kept feeling like I should be enjoying it more than I was. Perhaps that means there is also an element of right-book-wrong-time at play. Whatever the case, I can understand why this one has been so polarizing, but there was certainly enough of merit that I’d be willing to check out what Williams does next.
You can pick up a copy of Supper Club by clicking here.
Let’s connect: Twitter | Goodreads | Support me on Ko-fi
Interesting review. I did consider reading this novel when I saw it at the library, but I wasn’t sure. I will add to the maybe pile…
I’d be interested to hear your thoughts if and when you decide to pick it up!
I felt the same about this one Callum and to be honest would have liked way more on the politics of the supper club and a lot less naval gazing.
Yes, that’s a great way to put it! The club itself ended up feeling more like a device than a particularly integral or well explored part of the story, which felt like a wasted opportunity.
Nah, I don’t think this one is for me. I agree, it sounds like there are plenty of good ingredients, but if they are not mixed together with finesse and balance, the end result may still be underwhelming.
I definitely think the execution could have been stronger in some areas. It’s lingering in my mind at the moment though, so I’m intrigued to see how it fairs over time; whether it improves or weakens the more I mull it over.
I wasn’t sure about this one and I don’t think I’ll be reading it. Not a fan of clunky LGBT representation!
It’s definitely a pet peeve of mine as well! I didn’t feel there was anything deliberately problematic here, but that doesn’t stop it grating unfortunately.
Great review! It’s good to hear about some of the book’s flaws going in, especially since I’ve been so excited about the premise. How disappointing that the LGBTQ representation isn’t done as well as it could be, and that the themes are so spelled out, though I’m glad there were some pros to the book for you as well. It does sound like Williams will be a good author to watch even if this one didn’t quite come together!
Thank you! I’m really intrigued to see how everyone else gets on with this one! 😊
Great review! Overall, I enjoyed this though I agree that the peripheral characters were rather lacking and I ended up feeling like it wasn’t a real portrayal of female friendship.
Thank you! Yes, it’s a shame there was some untapped potential. I liked it but wanted to love it!
“Clunky dialogue full of exposition regularly spells out the novel’s every thematic intention with little room for debate”—oh nooo I hate it when books are too heavy handed! And I’m also disappointed to hear about the misrepresentation of LGBTQ individuals. This was one of the books that looked very intriguing to me from the WP squad’s list. I would still be interested in it but maybe not a priority for now. Really appreciate your balanced review!
Thank you! Yes, it’s the kind of book I’m glad to have read because it was interesting, but I wouldn’t rush to recommend it unless someone was really keen!
Oh, you make very good points here, I need to re-think my experience with the book! I remember quickly frowning at the way we find out about Sash being trans, but couldn’t pinpoint what exactly bothered me and I ended up forgetting about it afterwards, but you put it quite nicely: it’s basically a plot twist and she does feel like a token character at times, although I was pleased to have a trans character in the group. Brilliant review, and quite fair that you didn’t enjoy it much!
Yeah, I loved that the author included a trans woman in a female only space and what she was saying with that decision, so I’m sure she was well meaning with the representation 😊
HMMM…. INTERESTING!!!
Intrigued for your thoughts 👀
Pingback: Review: Supper Club | literaryelephant
Pingback: July Wrap Up | Callum McLaughlin